THE CHANNEL SHALL BE BLOCKED IF VIOLATIVE ON TERMS AND POLICIES NO INSISTENCE ON FIR State v. A Duraimurugan Pandian Sattai @ Duraimurugan and Another The accused is a youtuber and was held for making derogatory statement against the CM of Tamil Nadu. There was petition for cancellation of bail of the convict. As the accused committed civil contempt by continuing the act of offence. The accused contented that there are several similar contents on the same platform, but no action against them. The Madras HC observed that It is an offence u/s 69A(3) of IT Act and action shall be taken accordingly by blocking , even if no FIR is filed against such content. With a team of Commercial and litigation Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in commercial disputes, including Insolvency Proceedings. We are regularly involved in representations before NCLT, NCLAT, DRT and other commercial tribunals in India.