OBSTRUCTOR’S CLAIMS OVER DECREE PROPERTY MUST BE DETERMINED IN EXECUTION PEOCEEDINGS AND NOT IN SEPARATE SUIT: SUPREME COURT In this case, an application was filed under Order XXI Rule 97 with respect to resistance or obstruction to possession of immovable property that have to be determined by the Court dealing with the application which was held that in accordance with Order XXI Rule 101 CPC. The Supreme Court observed this while delivering its judgement in a civil appeal filed by Bangalore Development Authority against the order passed by the Executing Court dismissing its applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC in Execution Case filed by the decree holder against the judgement debtor. With a team of Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in legal disputes.