NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROCLAMATION ISSUED U/S 82(1) OR 82(4) CRPC FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL: MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT Madhya Pradesh High Court recently held that for the purposes of an anticipatory bail, proclamation proceedings under Section 82 (1) and Section 82(4) are similar in effect. The Court observed that the procedure adopted u/s.82(4) of Cr.P.C. was no different than the procedure adopted u/s.82(1) of CrPC. Reddy and Reddy law firm has a team of lawyers specialized in handling criminal law matters.
This is your website preview.
Currently it only shows your basic business info. Start adding relevant business details such as description, images and products or services to gain your customers attention by using Boost 360 android app / iOS App / web portal.
NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROCLAMATION ISSUED U/S 8...
2021-07-08T14:36:36
NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROCLAMATION ISSUED U/S 82(1) OR 82(4) CRPC FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL: MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT Madhya Pradesh High Court recently held that for the purposes of an anticipatory bail, proclamation proceedings under Section 82 (1) and Section 82(4) are similar in effect. The Court observed that the procedure adopted u/s.82(4) of Cr.P.C. was no different than the procedure adopted u/s.82(1) of CrPC. Reddy and Reddy law firm has a team of lawyers specialized in handling criminal law matters.
2021-07-08T14:36:36
Share it on
Submit Your Enquiry