Preview

This is your website preview.

Currently it only shows your basic business info. Start adding relevant business details such as description, images and products or services to gain your customers attention by using Boost 360 android app / iOS App / web portal.

REDDYANDREDDYASSOCIATES 55dafb5d4ec0a407c44969ae Services https://www.reddyandreddylawfirm.com

CAPTIVE CONSUMERS/CAPTIVE USERS ARE NOT LIABLE ...

  • 2021-12-13T14:24:28

CAPTIVE CONSUMERS/CAPTIVE USERS ARE NOT LIABLE TO PAY ADDITIONAL SURCHARGE UNDER SECTION 42(4): SUPREME COURT Under Section 2(15) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the captive consumers are different and distinct and they form a separate class by themselves. In the present matter was considering a civil appeal passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Delhi. In the impugned judgement, the Appellate Tribunal had allowed the appeals preferred by the respondents the ‘captive consumers’ and had set aside the order passed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission by which the State Commission had held that the group of ‘captive consumers’ are liable to pay additional surcharge. The issue that arose for consideration was whether the captive consumers/captive users are liable to pay the additional surcharge leviable under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. With a team of Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in legal disputes.

CAPTIVE CONSUMERS/CAPTIVE USERS ARE NOT LIABLE TO PAY ADDITIONAL SURCHARGE UNDER SECTION 42(4): SUPREME COURT Under Section 2(15) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the captive consumers are different and distinct and they form a separate class by themselves. In the present matter was considering a civil appeal passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Delhi. In the impugned judgement, the Appellate Tribunal had allowed the appeals preferred by the respondents the ‘captive consumers’ and had set aside the order passed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission by which the State Commission had held that the group of ‘captive consumers’ are liable to pay additional surcharge. The issue that arose for consideration was whether the captive consumers/captive users are liable to pay the additional surcharge leviable under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. With a team of Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in legal disputes.

  • 2021-12-13T14:24:28

Have any question or need any business consultation?

Have any question or need any business consultation?

Contact Us