Preview

This is your website preview.

Currently it only shows your basic business info. Start adding relevant business details such as description, images and products or services to gain your customers attention by using Boost 360 android app / iOS App / web portal.

REDDYANDREDDYASSOCIATES 55dafb5d4ec0a407c44969ae Services https://www.reddyandreddylawfirm.com

ABSCONDING PERSONS NOT ENTITLED TO ANTICIPATORY BA...

  • 2021-10-22T12:26:09

ABSCONDING PERSONS NOT ENTITLED TO ANTICIPATORY BAIL : SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court stated that a person who is absconding or has been declared a proclaimed offender is not entitled to anticipatory bail. The Court also held that a person will not be entitled to anticipatory bail merely because the nature of accusation arose out of a business transaction. The present case arose after a cheque given by the accused as part of a business transaction came to be dishonoured. An FIR was lodged against the respondent-accused for offences under Sections 406, 407, 468, 506 of the IPC with a warrant of arrest. Regarding the argument that the accusation arose out of a business transaction, the Court held that what is required to be considered is the nature of allegation and the accusation and not that the nature of accusation is arising out of a business transaction. With a team of Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in legal disputes. We are regularly involved in representation before Courts and Tribunals in India.

ABSCONDING PERSONS NOT ENTITLED TO ANTICIPATORY BAIL : SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court stated that a person who is absconding or has been declared a proclaimed offender is not entitled to anticipatory bail. The Court also held that a person will not be entitled to anticipatory bail merely because the nature of accusation arose out of a business transaction. The present case arose after a cheque given by the accused as part of a business transaction came to be dishonoured. An FIR was lodged against the respondent-accused for offences under Sections 406, 407, 468, 506 of the IPC with a warrant of arrest. Regarding the argument that the accusation arose out of a business transaction, the Court held that what is required to be considered is the nature of allegation and the accusation and not that the nature of accusation is arising out of a business transaction. With a team of Law experts, Reddy & amp; Reddy Law Firm has extensive experience and involvement in legal disputes. We are regularly involved in representation before Courts and Tribunals in India.

  • 2021-10-22T12:26:09

Have any question or need any business consultation?

Have any question or need any business consultation?

Contact Us